Wednesday, 14 August 2013

Hmm... Give me a moment to think!

What does it take to make you feel that enough is enough? What level of provocation can you endure? How much emotional turmoil can you accept before it all gets on top of you?

We are all familiar with the analogy of the spinning plates – you have to get the first one moving before moving to the next… to get things going you need direction and drive and hope that inertia will sustain the plate until you can return to give in a bit more kinetic energy. Meanwhile, you start spinning the next plate with an eye on the first and so it goes on. You need a good sense of timing and a perception of the strategy you can use to keep all of the plates moving.


You also need to have a strategy… studying the distance between each plate and the rate of inertia, so that you can combat the distance you have to move to reduce the time taken to maintain all of the plates. We are all encouraged in life to work hard for longer, often over reaching what is achievable to un favour with those who judge our performance.

Sometimes things come to a natural end. Will it be a graceful wind down or a huge crash? When you study the plates that the performers use, they are machined with a dimple to help them stay on the stick and they are perfectly balanced, giving the performer enough time to manage the spectacle. If only life could be so perfect. Many of my spinning plates are broken or overburdened with stuff that the inertia might shake off, but inevitably the unbalanced nature of the plate’s performance causes it to prematurely crash onto the floor. That’s sometimes how life is.

The point at which we make decisions to quit something or to sustain our energies is referred to as a moment of conscious intention. This is a point in time, which can happen at every moment of the day, where you have considered all of the variables surrounding a decision, and where you might select which form of action to take. I teach a little bit of electronics and in the preparation for building the electronic circuit, we have to make sure that the ‘systems flow chart’ operates successfully and that any procedural anomalies are accommodated. In electronics, we call this feedback.

It is the ability of the system to cope with the input from the sensor and process the data whilst it performs its ‘output’ or function – what the circuit is meant to do. Feedback enables a circuit to respond to changes in the system and adapt, however as we all know, computers and electronic items can fill us with satisfaction and immense frustration, all at the same time!

In computing and robotics, the quest for artificial intelligence or sentience, is a long way off from the Arnold Schwarzenegger ‘Terminator' movie synopsis. We cannot enhance the sum of our parts through any biological means, except on the surface perhaps! Our bodies can be likened to a biological machine that performs in similar ways to that of an electronic system. We look at our body shape and our diet and want to get fit and healthy and to lose some weight because we have seen some other person or celebrity of a similar age with a better physique than ours, but inevitably in my case, the draw of the confectionary or the pizza and beer, over-rides my desire to stay healthy. My body enjoys the sweet taste of the sugar in the foods I enjoy, and it is doing a pretty good job at forming my body shape!

We can also do things such as abstaining from certain foods in the quest for a healthy lifestyle, but we can easily over-write these protocols when we feel we ‘deserve’ to be treated. I did an 12 mile cycle ride with my ‘athletic’ friend the other day, who on our return offered me a beer! We can put off things when it doesn't suit our current situation, and pursue what we would prefer to do instead.

There has been a debate about whether ‘free will’ is an actual psychological condition or whether there is in fact a hierarchy of behaviours that we rank in preference over others, which we would call biological determinism. Both free-will and determinism would work to explain our inability in keeping to the diet we made in our new year’s resolution. Just as we can choose which plates we want to keep spinning, we can choose which ones we will let drop. Scientists in the pursuit of what motivates our desire are currently looking at whether or not we have free will in making these types of choices at all.

I love the smell of fish ‘n’ chips. I love the texture of the fluffy potato in the crispy shell with the taste of the fried fats combined with the salt and vinegar; mixing this with the battered, deep fried cod with its white flesh that has the taste of the sea… it was once our number one fast food dish in the UK, but it has largely been usurped from the top spot in the national menu by an Indian curry. For me though, nothing can take away from the British seaside, my favourite cod ‘n’ chips wrapped in old newspaper, with liberal amounts of salt ‘n’ vinegar steaming in your hands.

Unfortunately I have found as I have got older, I cannot eat fish ‘n’ chips as often as I would like because the saturated fats unsettle my stomach, but still, I eat it anyway! We are exactly the same with many other things in our lives. I spend as much time as possible, distancing myself from education and school-work when on holiday, but it still manages to interrupt my relaxation in small ways. I went to pick up my daughter from Southend Airport the other evening and met a fellow teacher from the same school I work in. She was disappointed because her son’s flight was delayed by an hour. I looked at her in horror when she said, “Well, if I had known, I would have brought some planning with me!” This was 10pm on a Sunday evening. The last thing I would be thinking of doing at that time of night in my summer holiday was certainly not to complete the inevitable planning I will need to do before September.

We are all wired up completely differently it seems and yet some neuroscientists are publishing papers to suggest they have begun to understand the complexity of the sub-conscious mind. Subconsciously, I am always thinking and worrying about the amount of preparation I need to do before returning to school in autumn, it just doesn't become the forefront of my conscious thinking.  It all comes down from the work that scientists are doing on how our brain functions. Modern monitoring equipment and brain scanning equipment can be used to build a graphical map of how the neurons in the brain respond under different forms of stimulation. If you can conduct a series of controlled tests to stimulate a level of responses in a range of candidates, within controlled conditions, the data collected can be correlated to help corroborate the science behind how we make decisions.

Some tests suggest that in each of us, there is a degree of ‘sub-conscious’ activity in the brain, that pre-determines how we are going to react before we consciously realise our actions. The argument goes like this: You made the decision because in your mind you had already sub-consciously decided how you will react before giving the response you were going to make. So like in the electronic circuit, all of the variables that you have crammed into the programming of your brain are triggered when suitably stimulated by the various inputs you are exposed to. This neuron activity then presupposes the action you want to take, so in effect, tells you what to do and informs you how you ought to behave.

The conclusion being, that we do not have free will to choose our actions, it just feels that way. However, if we go back to the definition of the sub-conscious mind, this is still our own reasoning and our own intellect at work. It’s just that what we are asked to do is not always the focus of our attention at the point of hearing the request made of us. It doesn't mean we haven’t already at some point thought through how we would respond in certain decisions; we are designed to think and to be thoughtful. We can function on many parallel lines of reasoning to form a consensus that is translated into action. It is still me doing the thinking. The more alert that my mind is to the multi-layered or multi-faceted nature of human existence, the better I will be at functioning within it.

The opposite of free will is determinism – a state whereby the actions of our human nature are simply causal. We make connections in our brain chemistry and within our environment that is an inevitable conclusion to our social status and our education. Neuroscientists would argue that we are somehow locked into a pathway that is inevitable. The cause and the resultant ‘effect’s’ of this pathway, makes certain situations fit patterns of behaviour that would result in stereotypical behaviours that fit psychological and sociological patterns that are measurable… we are just biological machines after all.

As Christians, we believe that as human being’s, we are more than just a sentient being. Our belief is that we are created for a purpose with free-will to choose what we feel is right and proper for us to do. It creates a sense of purpose within our humanity, and leaves us with a choice. A choice to follow what God would want us to do and be, or a choice to follow our own more selfish ambition, however altruistic it may be.

We treat many mental health issues with a sense that the body and mind is a biological machine, where we can deal with the miss-firing of neurons that causes the imbalance in the brains bio-chemistry, with medication. We use medication to control or block the misfiring neuron pathways to re-balance our brain chemistry with varying degrees of success. In the past we have tried to re-set this imbalance with electric shock treatments, heavy sedation and mental health institutions. Today we are able to work with people in a way that integrates them into society and its ‘normal’ patterns of behaviour through better medication and counselling.

If I fancy fish ‘n’ chips because I have caught the aroma of them on the air, whether I am hungry or not, my desire for the taste determines my ‘need’ for eating them. I may not be hungry, but my desire for the taste, re-writes my reasoning protocols so that I can satisfy my desire. My problem is that too much saturated fat reacts with my digestion and can make me feel bloated and unsettled. So in my deliberation, which is the stronger: my desire for being sustained with a taste that I enjoy; or my realisation that too much, too often, will make me feel unwell? Rationally, I would choose to eat fish ‘n’ chips in moderation, perhaps as a treat; then the taste would remain special, and my diet would be improved. Emotionally however, I crave the taste and flavour more than I respect my body’s dietary requirements, so I become self-indulgent and suffer the consequences later! Let’s hope that I don’t treat more serious issues so casually…

There is a causal connection between our brain chemistry and our actions. If we hold what we know to be true or untrue of ourselves within our unconscious mind, when we need to make a decision, that which dominates our subconscious, will determine the course of any action we would pursue. For example, I always default leadership within a group, to those I deem more worthy… I never consider myself to be ‘worthy’ of taking a lead unless someone with institutional authority puts me into that role. I will always be at the back of the room for example, or feel inadequate in joining an unfamiliar group full of strangers, because I doubt myself and what I can offer others.

This brings to mind a reflection of my attitude during our church ‘sports-day’. I am not a sportsman and lack any sense of a competitive edge, much to my sporty son’s dismay. My need to prove myself physically is only a small part of my nature, perhaps due to my failure to perform well against my peers at such things in the past. I enjoy my cycling and even enjoy running, which I keep telling myself I ought to return to, but never do. So the motivational drivers to attend the church sports day were very low. I convinced myself that I could at least be sociable and perhaps sit and read my book.

So in a sense, I predetermined the outcome of the occasion through my negative evaluation of the experience I was likely to encounter. However, the Achilles’ heel to my plan is my limited social-interaction skills. I do have a repertoire of polite conversation starters, as we all do, but I am not the best at engaging people beyond the ordinary. This is why relationships and making connections is so important for our soul. The inevitable conclusion being that I had done my usual thing of isolating myself from the competitors of the sports day and those rushing around organising the event. I had relegated myself to an also-ran; I was in attendance to show my support, but I made no significant contribution.

In this place of solitude, the enemy has his way with me. The voice in my head speaks to me in that condescending tone that is both familiar and wearisome… Look Roger, you don’t know how to interact with these people and they have left you to yourself… what possible hope have you got of being a church leader if you cannot even sustain these simple friendships… look at how well they all get on with each other and how they enjoy each other’s company, with you sat here on your own… look at all of those young adults that you have excluded yourself from by your actions, typical behaviour of yours to make yourself absent from their company… look at how much fun they are having and look at you sat here – it’s not as if you are that athletic of even ‘cool’ enough to spend time with them anyway… you have begun to think positively about yourself and now look, you are back in that same loathsome place!”

If I lived my life by my nature, I would have a miserable existence – believing in the lies I tell myself. If I doubt God’s truth for my life, I can be easily swayed by my conflicted emotion - Thank God that faith is not based on emotion! If it were so, my emotions would rob me of any sense of dignity from which I could pursue the ambition that God has birthed in my soul. However, with my emotions still raw from my internalised battle, I then encountered two more situations that would trigger my self-doubt. I was talking with one person who happened to mention that they had spoken at our churches homeless charity, the Storehouse, last Sunday. Immediately, that competitive edge that I deny exists in me, raises its voice inside my head and says – look, “Look, he has been asked to speak about Jesus in the storehouse Sunday service, and you haven’t.” This triggers again my self-doubt in a tsunami of emotions, thoughts and feelings pushing me back into that place of feeling jealous and inadequate.

The simple matter is that it wasn’t anything to do with the status of being asked to speak at a Christian presentation, but rather what I think about myself. I want to serve God in as many ways and opportunities that are created to do so. When I hear of others doing what I would love to do, it isn’t really jealousy as that is just my emotional response to what I have heard, but rather the yearning within me to serve. I would love to be able to serve God in a full time capacity, and was perhaps envious of the opportunity he had been given, to share how God has worked through his life.

Of upmost importance to me is that people don’t get the wrong idea and see me just as some religious person, but rather as someone who loves God. If I am seen as a religious person, then I have failed in my expression of love for the one who saved me from myself. Was my attitude at the sports day indicative of the person I had become? Was my distancing from the event a reflection of my ‘religious’ isolation? Am I not one in heart and mind with all believers?

All the believers were united in heart and mind. And they felt that what they owned was not their own, so they shared everything they had.
(Acts 4:32)

If my desire was to serve myself, then I would be lying to myself in trying to convince myself otherwise… my purpose is to serve God first, and in that have fellowship with those who share my faith. What more of me therefore, do I need to relinquish in order for the transforming work of the Holy Spirit to be revealed in my life? In the book of Acts, I have always quizzed the story of Ananias and Sapphira in chapter 5. Here is a man and his wife who have become Christians, and who have committed themselves to serving the church community by selling their property and giving the proceeds to the church leadership for distribution in the community. Both die. They die because they withhold from God, that which is his to use, and they lie about it.

But there was a certain man named Ananias who, with his wife, Sapphira, sold some property. He brought part of the money to the apostles, claiming it was the full amount. With his wife’s consent, he kept the rest. Then Peter said, “Ananias, why have you let Satan fill your heart? You lied to the Holy Spirit, and you kept some of the money for yourself. The property was yours to sell or not sell, as you wished. And after selling it, the money was also yours to give away. How could you do a thing like this? You weren’t lying to us but to God!” As soon as Ananias heard these words, he fell to the floor and died. Everyone who heard about it was terrified. Then some young men got up, wrapped him in a sheet, and took him out and buried him. About three hours later his wife came in, not knowing what had happened. Peter asked her, “Was this the price you and your husband received for your land?” “Yes,” she replied, “that was the price.” And Peter said, “How could the two of you even think of conspiring to test the Spirit of the Lord like this? The young men who buried your husband are just outside the door, and they will carry you out, too.
(Acts 5: 1-9)

We do not know what transpired before this event except for the implied statements that their property and the proceeds from the sale was theirs to do as they willed. They must have promised to offer the full amount of the sale in order for the accusation that some of the profit was withheld from the community, being levelled at them. It is clear that the incident was meant as a message for the community to honour God with both their words and their actions.

So the question I have to ask myself is, ‘Do I really want to do this stuff for God because if I do, I will need to give it my all if I am serious about it.’ What price am I willing to pay in order to serve him? God demands all of us, not a small percentage reserved for when we want to feel religious –all of us. When I am willing to lay down my desire and my self-will, then I am able to access what God wants for me, and in so doing, recognise that what God wanted for me was in fact, the best thing that could have happened.

“So my advice is, leave these men alone. Let them go. If they are planning and doing these things merely on their own, it will soon be overthrown. But if it is from God, you will not be able to overthrow them. You may even find yourselves fighting against God!”
(Acts 5: 38-39)

I was brought-up by a controlling parent and therefore have a tendency to be submissive in certain situations where there are more assertive individuals. It’s probably what contributes to my lack of competitiveness. I always fear that I will not be accepted by others who I deem to be far more socially connected than me. When I have spoken out in public situations to champion something I have believed in, my comments have not always been well received and I have made mistakes in the past that I have had difficulty in reconciling with the conduct that was expected of me. So these things all add-up to feed my negative self-image and feed my reservations. Do these elements then add to my difficulties in making decisions or in seeing things positively and with optimism?

Psychologists would suggest that the negative feelings that I experienced, would be suppressed within my subconscious and I would repress memories or trivialise situations so as not to open-up old wounds. When life is hard and it feels as though my decision making and my conduct have led to consequences that challenge my core being, do I psychologically cycle-down into a ‘told-you-so mentality’, or are there any reserves within me that can counter that challenge? How many plates can I keep spinning before I lose control and my world crashes down around my ears? The neuroscientists would probably suggest none. The causal factors of my decision making and the pre-determination of my subconscious thinking, would indicate that what would happen, was going to be: ‘To be, or not to be? That is the question!’

To be, or not to be: that is the question:
Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
Or to take arms against a sea of troubles,
And by opposing end them? To die: to sleep;
No more; and by a sleep to say we end
The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks
That flesh is heir to, 'tis a consummation
Devoutly to be wished. To die, to sleep;
To sleep: perchance to dream: ay, there's the rub;
For in that sleep of death what dreams may come?
When we have shuffled off this mortal coil,
Must give us pause: there's the respect
That makes calamity of so long life;
For who would bear the whips and scorns of time,
The oppressor's wrong, the proud man's contumely,
The pangs of despised love, the law's delay,
The insolence of office and the spurns
That patient merit of the unworthy takes,
When he himself might his quietus make
With a bare bodkin? Who would fardels bear?
To grunt and sweat under a weary life,
But that the dread of something after death,
The undiscovered country from whose bourn
No traveller returns, puzzles the will
And makes us rather bear those ills we have
Than fly to others that we know not of?
Thus conscience does make cowards of us all;
And thus the native hue of resolution
Is sickness o'er with the pale cast of thought,
And enterprises of great pith and moment
With this regard their currents turn awry,
And lose the name of action.
(William Shakespeare: Hamlet 3/1)

I am not a great reader of Shakespeare, nor until I wrote this blog, have I ever read the full speech contained in this passage from Hamlet. I'm not even sure of all the terms in the old English used here, but I hope you have caught the intent. Here is a discourse of a man wrestling with the questions of life. Are we causal beings determined by our biological reasoning, or are we more than the sum of our parts?



Neuroscience may show us a picture of how our minds are alive with thought, reason and action, but to suggest that there is no ‘us’ in that reasoning, is to reject any notion that we are in fact sentient beings with the right to choose our own destiny and the imagination to believe in a better world. We all dream of what is to come within our present reality, and make plans for the future. Our free will to choose is governed by our ability to make rational decision in respect of, or indeed, in spite of, what had gone on before. Our free will helps us to lift ourselves out of what we have become and helps us to inform our choices in the direction we want to take.

If we relegate our decision making to a set of pre-determined, sub-conscious pathways, we could argue in law, that our misdemeanour's were not conscious decisions, but a consequence of our bio-chemistry. The law does not cater for this type of logic – ‘I couldn't help myself.’ The law exists because we have a moral code and that society functions around an individual’s ability to exercise their personal integrity in their dealings with those in the community. A breakdown of these boundaries determines how we can make others responsible for their own actions when comparing what they have done against a standard that we all share in our community... the law of the land. Maybe this is why Ananias and Sapphira were judged to be unworthy and punished for their misdeeds:

“Perhaps, denying ones free will simply provide the ultimate excuse to behave as one likes.” (Neuroscientists Vohs and Schooler 2008)

“Soon, we must choose what is right, from that which is easy.”
(Professor Dumbledore: Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire)

It is in my weakness that I realise that I can’t spin all of the plates and that in fact, on reflection, I am tired of trying to keep them spinning. It is at these low point, of which there are a great many in life, when I have expended all of my energy, that my thoughts turn to how God could sustain me in life’s quest. When I look at where I am placing all of my energies in trying to keep my life going, I recognise that without Jesus in my life, it is in fact, all in vain. Jesus tells it like this:

Can all your worries add a single moment to your life? Of course not! And if worry can't do little things like that, what's the use of worrying over bigger things? "Look at the lilies and how they grow. They don't work or make their clothing, yet Solomon in all his glory was not dressed as beautifully as they are. And if God cares so wonderfully for flowers that are here today and gone tomorrow, won't he more surely care for you? You have so little faith! And don't worry about food - what to eat and drink. Don't worry whether God will provide it for you. These things dominate the thoughts of most people, but your Father already knows your needs. He will give you all you need from day to day if you make the Kingdom of God your primary concern. "So don't be afraid, little flock. For it gives your Father great happiness to give you the Kingdom. "Sell what you have and give to those in need. This will store up treasure for you in heaven! And the purses of heaven have no holes in them. Your treasure will be safe -- no thief can steal it and no moth can destroy it. Wherever your treasure is, there your heart and thoughts will also be.
(Luke 12: 24-34)

When we read what Jesus states about our irrational fear and the security that can be found in him, it perhaps indicates where Ananias and Sapphira went wrong. They were acting with duplicity in that they were trying to secure their future by storing a small sum of money for themselves, alongside the gift given to the apostles for use in the church community. They perhaps were not certain of their faith in what the apostles taught, by give everything away. In the natural we are all like that, trying to preserve what we have, while covenanting a tithe to our local churches. At this time though in the early church, the exercising of one’s faith meant more than mere tokenism. This is exactly what Ananias and Sapphira were being charged with. Their fate served as a warning to the rest of the assembled apostles and new disciples, that this was a serious business.

When I look up from my self-pity and gaze into the face of the one whose perfect love drives out all fear, I start to live. As I sit in the presence of God and receive his love; a love that is poured out for each one of us who have faith in the death of his son Jesus; I think of my life now in the light of his glorious resurrection, and find that I can be at one with myself and with the world. Oh yes, my old self keeps getting in the way of this peace, but Jesus’ love goes on protecting me because he cherishes my life more than he did his own. On the cross when he cried: ‘It is finished!’ it was my life too and the person that I had become, that was forgiven. The condemnation that I felt for the life I have lived ended at the cross. His love wants to protect me from future harm and from the pain of bad decisions, but he gives me free will to make that choice to believe in this truth.

Do I choose to follow him, or do I go back to my own way? I know that I should do what he wants me to do in my subconscious thoughts, but my conscious self is so preoccupied with me and how I feel, I miss the nuances of what Jesus has being trying to say. Who am I that I can reject God so often and yet demand so much from him; to think that I am worthy of such attention? But worthy I am. Jesus’ cousin John said he wasn't worthy so much as to untie the straps form the sandals on Jesus’ feet, a servants job… yet we can sit with him at his table, and eat with him, share with him, commune with him. We are made blameless and spotless in his sight but we are reminded as we sit at his table that it wasn't without cost – Jesus paid for us to be there with his life.

Jesus’ love has integrity and honesty. He is not self-seeking, but speaks the words of his father. His love is tempered with forgiveness and compassion. Who are we to go around telling people what is right and what is wrong, just because we have glimpsed a lit bit of God’s kingdom? Let God be the judge of the choices we make so that all can enter into his grace and mercy. None of us is greater than the next; just as when the disciples argued whether they would sit to the right or to the left of Jesus. There is no hierarchy or significance in God’s kingdom – all those that choose to follow him are accepted.

Let us think of ways to motivate one another to acts of love and good works. And let us not neglect our meeting together, as some people do, but encourage one another, especially now that the day of his return is drawing near.
(Hebrews 10: 24-25)

It is because we are in a relationship with Jesus, that we can begin to make sense of those things in our lives, which may have contributed to the decisions we have made in the past. Jesus helps us to knock down our defences and loosen our grip of those areas in our lives which are unedifying. The Holy Spirit fills us with his presence so that we can be encouraged and comforted by him; he helps us to care about the things that he places on our heart. When this relationship is out-of-sync between what we choose to do, and what God’s will is for us, we are going to appear dysfunctional. When our lives are in synergy with God’s will for us through the consuming work of the Holy Spirit, then all goes well with us. My purpose is not to be so in tune with my culture that it invades my character and I lose my focus on God.

So earlier, when I have spoken about my sense of loneliness and my perceptions of unworthiness within my culture, God through the work of the Holy Spirit is able to banish these emotions as he starts a new creation within my heart. When you start to build a new building, you have to begin with the foundations. Recognising that Jesus atones for my past mistakes, releases me into this new foundation – a new beginning. No longer will I be the unworthy ‘slave’ to my negative consciousness, but I will be released from that which holds me captive.

Where my old nature has made me reserved and a little conservative in my personality and the forms of self-expression that I employ, he releases me from all of that… I can’t hide behind my reserved British nature either! If I truly know the love of Jesus in my heart and understand his truth then like Peter, I will tell others of the love that has filled me with an inexpressible joy (1 Peter 1:8).

Prozac may be prescribed today as society’s most popular medication in dealing with depressing lives that we live, but it is not really going to be a substitute to fulfilling society’s deeper longing. Only following the will of God will do that. Medication can only have a placebo effect in comparison to what we can experience as sons and daughters to the living God. Yes Prozac is a somewhat powerful anti-depressant, used in the treatment of many with mental health issues, but until we truly know God, our dependence on it is just a transition to something better.

When we first encounter God’s presence through the Holy Spirit and his sense of justice and his compassion, it can be a painful experience like being in the pangs of childbirth. No mum wants to remember the pain they experience in the birth of their child, but the release of Joy, pure joy that comes from that maternal bond, soon pushes aside any memory of the pain in favour of nurturing their new-born child. Later on they might describe it as being the worst experience of their life but yet, at the same time, the pain was a necessary part of something most wonderful. This is the same Joy that we can find in our re-birth as sons and daughters of the living God.

Joy is often a transient emotion of something that makes us happy but which is gone in a moment. If we are lucky enough to remember those moments in time when we experience true joy, we learn to treasure these moments and store them in memory. Having the Holy Spirit dwell in you makes you notice how much of this world, God cares about. He fills you with joy because as you recognise your sense of purpose in this world, you start to live life in partnership with the God who cares deeply for what it is you are doing.

As you regain your identity as a child of God and choose to live for him, it fills him with joy. As in any relationship, when you learn to serve others, you learn to love unconditionally; and you learn to bring the Kingdom of God down to the Earth by your acts of kindness and your generosity – what greater task can there be?

And now, dear brothers and sisters, one final thing; fix your thoughts on what is true, and honourable, and right, and pure, and lovely, and admirable. Think about things that are excellent and worthy of praise. Keep putting into practice all you have learned and received from me—everything you heard from me and saw me doing. Then the God of peace will be with you.

(Philippians 4: 8-9)

Thursday, 8 August 2013

Fire Walls, Trojans and filters

I really like the music of the late 1990’s and early 2000. It was a period when Brit-Pop was internationally acclaimed and guitar bands were at their height. Emerging from the techno sounds of the 80’s with brief highlights from Punk and some alternative Indie groups, it was a relief for me anyway to get away from the synthesised techno sounds in favour of some guitar driven rock… Hey, I am in my 40’s!

There were a number of great TV shows too like Seinfeld, Absolutely Fabulous, Frasier and the X-Files, but one that stood out over the others like ‘Game-of-Thrones’ seems to do today, was the sitcom ‘Friends’. It seemed to speak to a generation of young adults like me, of the importance of relationship, the struggles we all had with life, and the expectations placed on us by our parents and by society. It was all wrapped up with good humour and a rich vein of sexual chemistry that gave you a sense of ‘will-they-or-won’t they’ kind of humour.

Friends reflected the ‘coffee-shop’ culture it was meant to represent, with only Monica and Chandler having in one sense, a ‘normal’ relationship. The others had a history of broken relationships and the emotional turmoil that goes with those events in our lives. Each character reflected the world as seen by the script writers: One brought up with a cross dressing dad who used humour to cope; the Italian American alpha male with smouldering eyes and the one liner ‘How you doin?’; the intellectual who had identity issues with the socio-emotional aspects of a relationship; the neurotic one whose contented family upbringing led to issues with body image and in being unable to interact within certain social situations; the new age hippy-type who had dabbled in alternative therapies and had paranormal experiences; and the archetypal beauty who seemingly oblivious to how easy life was for someone with wealth, yet misunderstood how her status affected those around her.

Wow… there is so much I can remember about that show! By the end of its run I had kind of got tired of the comedy and the characters; the show had run its course and we had all grown up. When I look back at the show today on the countless re-runs, I am surprised at how much of its content, possibly on account of my youthful approach to life at the time and my more mature outlook today, had overtly sexual content that I had overlooked. 

Now I felt that the show was a bit, well coarse... I had reached an epoch in my life as a parent, but also in the back of my mind, I had become the person I vowed not to be when I was young. I think it is because with multi-channel TV, these shows that used to be shown after what is called the ‘evening water-shed’ in the UK, are now shown at any time of the day.

The water-shed was a time agreed by all of the broadcasters where adult content would be allowed to be broadcast. It allowed parents to get little ones off to bed, and left enough time for the pre-teen to feel that they could watch more adult programming. TV shows and movies shown after 9 pm in the evening were considered to have adult content in them that would include sex, violence and peril, some of which would have a darker or more sinister theme.

Let me be clear at this point. When I mean adult, I don’t mean pornographic movies, I mean programming design to suit an adults understanding and reasoning. I was watching an adult centred comedy news show that contained many jokes about politicians, particularly former Senator, Anthony Weiner who unfortunately has a surname that matches his exploits on Twitter (sexting scandal July 2013). We make use of innuendo all of the time, not necessarily sexual, but implied thinking that leads to a humorous ending, which is the core of modern comedy.

There is one particular comedian called Russell Howard whose show 'Good News', is one that my wife and I enjoy watching. He is clearly immersed in the expression of his heterosexual lifestyle and is a young comedian who pushes the envelope of what would have been considered good etiquette, a few decades ago, but which is now on the cusp of popular culture within his generation. There are some shows where clearly his production team allow him to indulge his fantasy in the aim of comedy that I have to say, spoils the humour… it’s a step too far for me. Like my preference for guitar driven rock, I make a decision that for me particularly, this comedian doesn't always fit with my conscious thinking. For others, he may be absolutely fantastic.

I came home one evening to find my daughter watching Friends. Initially I thought fondly about the show and that my daughter, now 12, exploring this world from my youth. I started watching the show with her, stood in the lounge in my work suit, I was soon feeling uneasy. The content was quite graphic, where once I had only seen the humour of the situation: One of the characters was going to commit adultery with another; one was contemplating a three-some to put some ‘fun’ into the bedroom; and the others were expressing their need to have sex because, well, they needed it.

I mentioned to my daughter that perhaps the content was a bit too adult for her to watch… she didn't understand what I meant without me having to draw out the innuendo  which I didn't want to do. I do worry now as a father about the content of programmes. In my youth, I would not have even considered certain topics to be harmful to me because I was immersed in the culture. But now with an urge to protect my daughter from adult content and innuendo, I viewed the TV show through different eyes. Not only that, Jesus has clothed me with his ‘filter’ to help me determine that which is wholesome and good for me, and that which is unsavoury.

Jesus reveals in me, that some of the drivers and ambitions from my culture have filtered into my character as I allowed it to programme my understanding and to condition my emotions. We can easily become immune or insensitive towards material that has content for specific audiences… we can choose to turn a blind eye to it or we can withdraw from the context from which the inappropriate material is being shown or used. It may sound a little ‘prudish’ to even suggest that broadcast-able content is of questionable quality, but with a fathers eye, I want to protect the one's I love.

There are two ways that secular observers may react to my statements regarding my apparent judgements on content. My reaction to such content, conjures notions of ‘censorship’ or ‘classification’ or ‘age limits’ or ‘boundaries’ or even a more aggressive word, ‘control’. The second observation is more overt. The issues that I now have with popular culture is somehow my problem; it isn't  society that is at fault here. Content is freely available to view because we have freedom to express our ideas; under article 19 of the human rights act, we have the freedom to seek or receive information, and to impart that knowledge through whatever medium is appropriate.

There are legal conditions that protect ethnic communities and some religious groups from being abused by those who would think to misuse their freedom to express their opinion. One area in the news this week (27th July 2013) is the UK Prime Minister, David Cameron’s determination to ensure that consumers have to ‘opt-into’ internet pornography sites, and in particular gratuitous sites that he describes as a “poisonous website” that “corrodes childhood”.

Yes, all computers have security settings; schools have internet filters; parents have responsibilities, but those unprotected from casually accessing material or content that is inappropriate, are always going to become vulnerable in an increasingly media savvy society. Some internet computers are so unsophisticated with their filters that they block seemingly innocent sites and yet can allow access to others that should have been blocked. We haven’t even mentioned mobile devices…

However, generational change slowly erodes traditional values in favour of the new. New expressions of etiquette and new protocols for interacting with each other are contained within a culture and are re-written to make those of a previous generation, question this fresh expression of ‘freedom’. As a Christian, I want to protect my daughter and my family from the excesses of society because of the brokenness of the lives of those we witness living to excess. Christians do not make up their morality as they go along, nor do they feel that because we can do a thing, we should do it. 

Life isn't about maximising my pleasure regardless of those it might affect… I want to protect my family and children from drunkenness; drug abuse; dependence on addictive substances; promiscuous or narcissistic lifestyles. I don’t want my children shouting profanities at others; verbally abusing then; physically abusing them; racially abusing people; lying; cheating; being deceptive or fraudulent… I don’t think anyone wants these qualities do they?

So how does society get like this? Watching the TV this evening, during the advertisement break, a commercial for car insurance was aired. Picture the scene: Car parked in a lonely picturesque location – camera pans to a man’s face as a robot approached the driver’s window – the man’s face is an expression of ‘pleasure’ – robot taps on the window to ask about the man’s insurance – woman in the passenger seat suddenly jumps up with the innuendo of a sexual act being performed – said robot explains the insurance offer leaving the car’s passengers and the advertisements viewers stunned. Is this really what we have become?

This is why I was concerned that my daughter was watching friends at 4pm in the afternoon at 12 years of age, and why internet use in my home is viewed with a degree of supervision. Putting safeguards in place, protects all those involved in relationships and raises awareness in each participant what boundaries are in place. That is why the Christian church has traditionally warned about the social consequences of indulging in inappropriate activities that distract people from healthy lifestyles.

My son made a ‘bet’ with my neighbour about the prospect of Cristiano Ronaldo being back at Manchester United for the start of the 2013 season. I explained to him at 9 years of age, that the bet was an agreement and that it couldn't be forfeit for anything else or absolved early. He was committed to purchasing the ice-cream! After a bit of time thinking he said, ‘Dad – I don’t want to do this bet.’ I explained that he had made a commitment that was like a contract, so he had to honour the terms even if now, he didn't want to agree to it. He was a bit too young to explain about the dangers of gambling, but he previously asked me why men go into betting shops…

We educate our children so that they will make healthy choices and hope that they are able to deal with the emotion of the decisions we make that don't go too well. Unfortunately, not all parents are able to offer their children the support needed in the modern world. We are either dealing with the problems we have experienced with life and our own childhoods, or wrestling with the demands of work. It’s all too easy to stick them in front of the TV or the wider range of media that they have access to, leaving them exposed to whatever nuance they find as entertainment.

When we are young, we have such self confidence in our beliefs and in our abilities that we don’t want to be told what we can or cannot do. If the person putting in the boundaries was using the more passive word ‘shouldn't’ we still think that they mean don’t. Those that do express caution are often referred to as being a kill-joys. When we are young we are not concerned about consequences, nor are we enamoured by some ‘well-meaning’ person group or programme telling us what could happen if we are not armed with all of the information we need to make intelligent choices.

This is what it comes down to in the end: do you trust me to make the correct choices? I know that as my love for my children grows, I am going to have to learn to let go. I shouldn't suffocate them, nor should I want to wrap them in cotton wool. What I would dearly love, is that I do my job as a dad correctly. If I love them and cherish them and champion them, they would hopefully come to me with their problems… not that I could solve all of them. I want to be a good listener and a good translator of their raw emotions so that I can help them make sense of life.

If I try to censor their lives too much, then there is a danger of them becoming dysfunctional socially, or fear my judgement when they err from what they believe I have sanctioned, however lovingly I did it. We all have to ‘own’ what it is we believe to be true of ourselves, and true of our nature. We are very precious to God and worth far more than any earthly treasure, which is why as a dad, I want to protect my children. Our heavenly father earnestly yearns that things would go well with us. He has given us a set of laws that are designed to protect us from the dangers of the world we live in, whilst making certain that we have a transparent pathway from which we can aspire to holiness.

It’s this latter part of ‘holiness’ that we reject when we do not want to do what God desires of us. As I said earlier, none of us want to do what we are told… sometimes when we learn through experience that what we were told, was indeed the right action to take, we begrudging admit that the person advising us was indeed correct. But until we ‘own’ that knowledge for ourselves, we question the motive behind the suggestion.

We can be bullish about what happens to us, learn to harden our hearts against the emotional turmoil, or even fill the vacuum of doubt and the insecurity we felt with a self-conscious ‘told-you-so’. And the guilt… yes that too. The shame of it! What will people think if they found out what happened… we could spiral into an even deeper sense of self-pity and isolation, feeling lonely within our circle of existence and denying ourselves of any joy. Some might say, “well just ignore it… in time the emotion will be dulled and you may be able to move on.” But I'm not so sure. It only takes one particular action from an often random occasion, to trigger a memory or an emotion that takes us right back to that place as though time hadn't moved on at all.

If we bury our inner voice and try to mask our true self with whatever drug or programme we invest our energies into, then we become dependent on those processes to maintain some sense of a functioning persona. I'm not a psychologist or a trained counsellor so please accept my apology if what I am writing doesn't sit well with you. We must de-bunk the myth that God is only interested in our punishment and that Christianity is some kind of spiritual police force, pointing out the wrong we do in order for us to feel guilty.

If we knowingly do something wrong and get found out, then we will feel emotionally guilty… some might say it is our internal conscience telling us that what we have done is wrong. The law is designed to do the same thing so that as a population, we are kept in check. I know I always feel uneasy around a policeman or woman, and yet I know I haven’t done anything wrong! People do feel nervous around representatives of the law. I always find it frustrating when driving along; where a seemingly ‘law-breaking’ motorist slows down to try to appear ‘law-abiding’. They draw-up alongside the police car, only to speed up again when they feel that they are at a sufficient distance.

There is nothing new in these behaviours. We have since the beginning of time, tried to question authority – particularly God’s authority. As human beings, we have shown that we have got it disastrously wrong. The humanists and the new atheists have for a long time, placed the blame for these errors squarely at the door of religion… “If God is good,” they might say, “why did it take so long for slavery to be abolished, or why suppress the rights of women?” Religion isn't God. Religion is what happens when ‘men’ get involved in administering God’s grace to the people. 

Israel was chosen by God to be a Holy Nation and a Royal Priesthood – the whole nation; not just a select few. Yet as soon as they had been rescued out of Egypt from persecution and slavery at the hand of Pharaoh by God’s servant Moses, they doubted where God was and how they were going to cope, now that they were free.

Over millennia of practice, the Jewish faith in administering the Law of Moses, had become so laboured by observance in the Law, that it obscured Jesus and his message of God. The Jewish leaders used their understanding of the Law to Judge Jesus and his message. Just as today, we do not take things at face value; the Jews also had reservations about what they saw. They doubted that Jesus was the Messiah not because of the amazing miracles eye-witnessed by the apostles, but because they thought they knew where he came from. How would a carpenter from Nazareth, whose father and mother they all knew, go about proclaiming he was the son of man…?

I saw in the night visions, and behold, with the clouds of heaven there came one like a son of man, and he came to the Ancient of Days and was presented before him. And to him was given dominion and glory and a kingdom, that all peoples, nations, and languages should serve him; his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom one that shall not be destroyed.
(Daniel 7:13-14)

The Messiah was prophesied as the one who was coming to establish King David’s reign in Jerusalem, which was now occupied by the Roman Empire, one of many nations who had attempted to subjugate the Jewish people. The Jews tolerated the occupation as they were able to run the temple law in parallel to the rules of the occupation. This kept the Jewish leadership in control regarding the people’s spiritual consciousness. This suited the Roman occupiers as it enabled them to have a level of collaboration with the people in the form of tax collectors. The Jewish leaders also had the temple guard to do their bidding. The prospect of the Messiah coming to rescue the Jews from their occupation was tangible…

The Roman governor Pontius Pilate had previously crushed rebellions and was not thought to favour diplomacy. Historical records show that this account of him in the Gospel of Mark is out of character. In fact, he had in prison a rebel leader called Barabbas who had committed murder in an uprising in Jerusalem:

Very early in the morning the leading priests, the elders, and the teachers of religious law—the entire high council—met to discuss their next step. They bound Jesus, led him away, and took him to Pilate, the Roman governor. Pilate asked Jesus, “Are you the king of the Jews?” Jesus replied, “You have said it.” Then the leading priests kept accusing him of many crimes, and Pilate asked him, “Aren't you going to answer them? What about all these charges they are bringing against you?” But Jesus said nothing, much to Pilate’s surprise. Now it was the governor’s custom each year during the Passover celebration to release one prisoner—anyone the people requested. One of the prisoners at that time was Barabbas, a revolutionary who had committed murder in an uprising. The crowd went to Pilate and asked him to release a prisoner as usual. “Would you like me to release to you this ‘King of the Jews’?” Pilate asked. (For he realized by now that the leading priests had arrested Jesus out of envy.) But at this point the leading priests stirred up the crowd to demand the release of Barabbas instead of Jesus. Pilate asked them, “Then what should I do with this man you call the king of the Jews?” They shouted back, “Crucify him!” “Why?” Pilate demanded. “What crime has he committed?” But the mob roared even louder, “Crucify him!” So to pacify the crowd, Pilate released Barabbas to them. He ordered Jesus flogged with a lead-tipped whip, and then turned him over to the Roman soldiers to be crucified.
(Mark 15: 1-15)

Barabbas had committed murder; all that Jesus had done was make the blind see, the deaf hear, and the lame walk. Jesus was in this position because he had been betrayed by one of his own. Judas was recruited by Jesus to be one of the 12 disciples. Judas was a revolutionary. He was anticipating the return of the king and in the miracles and teaching of Jesus, he saw the Messiah. But something changed in him. Jesus wasn't acting in the way that Judas expected of the Messiah. It was his idea, and that of many Jews, that when the Messiah came, he would overthrow the Romans in a battle that would give honour to God.

However, it wasn't working out like that. Jesus had begun talking about his death when Judas was expecting to be preparing for confrontation. Judas is described as a zealot who was part of a group of people in the 1st century who sought to incite the people of Judea to expel the Romans from the Holy Land. Jesus’ ministry began to restore the glory of God to the people through his miracles and his teaching on the restoration of the kingdom struck a chord with people. As time went by, Judas began to harbour doubts about whether Jesus was truly the Messiah, whereas the other disciples had become certain of who Jesus was.

Judas carried the money purse and was probably involved in all of the arrangements that had to be made regarding taxes to the Romans and the taxes for temple worship. We must assume he was involved in providing accommodation and food; transportation… so when Mary, the sister of Lazarus who was raised from the dead, poured anointing oil over Jesus’ head as a symbol of embalming his body, Judas could only scoff at the action.

Six days before the Passover celebration began, Jesus arrived in Bethany, the home of Lazarus—the man he had raised from the dead. A dinner was prepared in Jesus’ honour. Martha served, and Lazarus was among those who ate with him. Then Mary took a twelve-ounce jar of expensive perfume made from essence of nard, and she anointed Jesus’ feet with it, wiping his feet with her hair. The house was filled with the fragrance. But Judas Iscariot, the disciple who would soon betray him, said, “That perfume was worth a year’s wages. It should have been sold and the money given to the poor.” Not that he cared for the poor—he was a thief, and since he was in charge of the disciples’ money, he often stole some for himself.
(John 12:1-6)

Judas had got tired of the merry-go round. His world-view was challenged and he didn't believe in Jesus as the Messiah any more. Perhaps when the Roman Centurion came to Jesus to ask for healing for his trusted slave, there were signs that even the authorities were responding to Jesus’ teaching (Luke 7: 1-10). For Judas, this would be fuel to his fire… If Jesus can turn the Roman Centurion, we can defeat the governor too. But Jesus taught the people that they should love their neighbour as themselves, which for a Jew, meant the Samaritan, the refugee, the social outcast and anyone who wasn't a Jew.

Jesus challenged the disciple’s faith in him at every opportunity. Sometimes they were clearly confused and asked Jesus to speak plainly to them:

Later, when Jesus was alone with the twelve disciples and with the others who were gathered around, they asked him what the parables meant. He replied, “You are permitted to understand the secret of the Kingdom of God. But I use parables for everything I say to outsiders, so that the Scriptures might be fulfilled:

‘When they see what I do, they will learn nothing.
When they hear what I say, they will not understand.
Otherwise, they will turn to me and be forgiven.’”

Then Jesus said to them, “If you can’t understand the meaning of this parable, how will you understand all the other parables?
(Mark 4: 10-13)

Jesus specifically challenged the 12 to answer for who they believed he was. We often read of Peter blurting out a response on behalf of all of them, but clearly he did not speak for Judas…

Simon Peter replied, “Lord, to whom would we go? You have the words that give eternal life. We believe, and we know you are the Holy One of God.” Then Jesus said, “I chose the twelve of you, but one is a devil.” He was speaking of Judas, son of Simon Iscariot, one of the Twelve, who would later betray him.
(John 6: 69-70)


Judas had seen all of the miracles. He had been there when 5000 people were fed. He had seen Jesus calm the stormy sea and walk on water. He had seen all that God did through Jesus and yet chose to reject what he saw because of the direction that Jesus was taking by talking of his premature death; this did not match Judas’ world view of a conquering king. How often do we do this in our own lives? We are happy to go along with things when it suits us, but as soon as our belief is challenged or our actions are brought to account, we will want to reject that which we used to believe because it is too uncomfortable for us to dwell in that place.

Perhaps it was the body language or the attitude towards him that Jesus read… the grumbling behind his back. Jesus would have noticed that Judas’ focus was in the wrong place, particularly when it came to money. Judas was committed to his course of action through that seed of doubt he planted in his own mind. It allowed him to ignore what he saw to be true in favour of what he wanted to believe. He had contacts with the temple in Jerusalem as Jesus always taught there in public. There were always temple taxes to pay and Judas was the finance officer… He was prepared to barter Jesus’ life away for 30 pieces of silver, which we know today, was the bounty for a slave or recompense for the loss of a slave (Exodus 21:32).

Judas was willing to forgo what he had seen in favour of what he wanted to believe. For Judas, a lot could be done with 30 pieces of silver – he was governed by his desire for wealth as we saw when Mary poured out the oil over Jesus' head. In Judas’ mind, he was bartering for the life of a fraud – as he saw it, which played straight into the hands of the High Priest and the Sanhedrin, who were looking for a way to get rid of Jesus. The Jewish leaders were standing behind their 'firewall' of the law, and Judas could be the 'Trojan' they needed to get to Jesus. Judas went back to the authority that he knew in the form of the temple guards, to prevent Jesus leading people astray. Judas saw Jesus' proclamations to be the 'Son of God' and yet he knew that he wasn't prepared to wipe out the Roman army as the heir to King David's throne, the Messiah, was prophesied as doing!

King David was prevented from building the original temple in Jerusalem, the one that Jesus said he would knock down and rebuild in three days, because he had shed too much blood (John 2:13-22):

 “My son Solomon, I wanted to build a Temple to honour the name of the Lord my God,” David told him. “But the Lord said to me, ‘You have killed many men in the battles you have fought. And since you have shed so much blood in my sight, you will not be the one to build a Temple to honour my name. But you will have a son who will be a man of peace.
(1 Chronicles 22: 7-9)

Jesus did not come with an army because it would have countered his ability to do Gods work. Jesus knew that Judas was to betray him and he was waiting for the time that his plot would be revealed. He asks the disciples if there were any swords – they produce two of them to which Jesus says will be enough (Luke 22:35-38). When Peter uses one of these swords to cut off the ear of the temple guard, Jesus shows God’s plan right there… he reattaches the guards ear through a miraculous healing. This is the God I believe in. Not some religious order of do’s and don't, but a person whose purpose was to bring restoration – let what needs to be done, be done, so that God would get the glory.

Jesus was turning mankind’s rules upside down… Jesus was prepared to become the ultimate sacrifice and have his blood spilled on the rubbish tip of the mountain called Golgotha, whilst being hung a wooden cross as a curse. This was the lowest form of death that anyone would want at the end of their lives – to be falsely accused; to have all that knew him run away in fear; to be sentenced to death by both the people of God and the gentiles. However, what we find in this crucifixion scene is that Jesus’ death unites humanity, both Jew and gentile, whilst at their lowest point.

Here’s just a few of the things we know happened:
  1. Jesus was slapped across the face to denote the high priests authority over his own – we physically assault those we feel cannot be controlled by reason, but when they give an account of themselves, it appears that they show defiance where those in charge feel sanctioned to use their physical power, to control the other person.
  2.  Restraint is used to deny Jesus his liberty to defend himself – Prophesies about Jesus, show that he would be bound and led away, but for the purposes of the High Priest, it again denotes to Jesus and those viewing the scene, that they believed they had the right, the means, and the law to do so - to punish him. It puts Jesus in a place of judgement… Isaiah 53:8 – “From prison and trial they led Him away to His death. But who among the people realized that He was dying for their sins – that He was suffering their punishment?”
  3. Jesus was tried without a Jury – witnesses were brought to testify against Jesus but he was not allowed to defend himself except to respond to the accusations made against him that resulted in (1) above. Those accusing Jesus, decide his fate. Isaiah 53:7-8a – “He was oppressed and treated harshly, yet He never said a word. He was led as a lamb to the slaughter. And as a sheep is silent before the shearers, He did not open His mouth. From prison and trial they led Him away to His death.”
  4. No criminal charge is brought against Jesus, just a religious charge of blasphemy – The high priest and the temple leaders feared the views of the people if they were to stone Jesus for blasphemy, so they illicit the help of the Roman authority to dispense justice and demand his crucifixion. The leaders knew their evidence was circumstantial so needed to get the unclean gentiles to do their business for them.
  5. The religious leaders use mob rule – Pontius Pilate does not want another Jewish uprising so is going with the flow. If he can quell this mob now with the right judgement, he might stave off a conflict situation and keep the peace. Matthew 26:67-68 – “Then they spit in Jesus’ face and hit Him with their fists. And some slapped Him, saying, ‘Prophesy to us, You Messiah! Who hit you that time?’”    Luke 23:11, 35 – “Now Herod and his soldiers began mocking and ridiculing Jesus. Then they put a royal robe on Him and sent Him back to Pilate. The crowd watched, and the leaders laughed and scoffed. ‘He saved others,’ they said, ‘let Him save Himself if He is really God’s Chosen One, the Messiah.’”
  6. The Jewish leaders use the law to protect their own interests – This is a carefully orchestrated action on the part of the Jewish leaders. They challenge Pilate to crucify Jesus because the Jewish leaders suggest it would be doing the will of Caesar… Did Pilate want word getting back to Caesar that he had not honoured his laws as governor – I think not?
  7. It suited the Jewish leaders to show allegiance to Caesar in order to absolve them of any responsibility in causing his death – it was only a few days before Passover so the chief priests and the rabbi’s did not want to become ritually unclean through dealing with Jesus; it also helped them avoid breaking the commandment: you should not kill.

There is so much more we could cover – it would take a lifetime of discipleship to investigate all of the interplay between the Jewish leaders and Jesus. People have always tried to justify their actions and to try and rationalise the logic of their decision making – it’s our human nature. We want to be at the centre of what we believe to be true; we don’t want to be told that we are wrong; we have more faith in what we want to believe, than in what we are told is true, particularly if we do not own that truth. Judas looked around and didn't see any justification in supporting Jesus’ ministry any longer, just as we all challenge those in authority or those with responsibility to lead us, particularly if we question their direction.

This so-called trial of Jesus was the final interplay between the customs of the old covenant tradition, and the ushering in of the new covenant that was shaped by Jesus’ death and resurrection to new life. What we choose to believe is born out of the evidence of what we see. It is clear in the gospel stories, which are eye-witness accounts of what happened to Jesus, that there is more evidence of God at work in this world, than there is evidence against God. God challenges us to test our understanding of him by putting our faith in his son, Jesus the Nazarene, formerly of Bethlehem and formerly of heaven.

Watching my daughter view a TV show with questionable content, brings to light the tension in our souls between what is social and culturally acceptable or lawful, and that which although lawful and culturally acceptable, is still wrong. It isn't my interpretation of the law that is doing the judging, it is the spirit within me; a spirit that is transforming my understanding of the world and the harm that can come from seemingly innocent sources. If I choose to follow what Jesus asks of me, I am going to find myself indifferent to the world I live in and seek to change it for the better, by revealing to the world, the love that was first shown to me: forgiveness, acceptance, mercy and grace.

This paragraph is from the book of Ezekiel in the Old Testament. Read it carefully as it tells the story of what happens to those who choose to turn away from their wrongdoing…

But if wicked people turn away from all their sins and begin to obey my decrees and do what is just and right, they will surely live and not die. All their past sins will be forgotten, and they will live because of the righteous things they have done. “Do you think that I like to see wicked people die?” says the Sovereign Lord. Of course not! I want them to turn from their wicked ways and live. However, if righteous people turn from their righteous behaviour and start doing sinful things and act like other sinners, should they be allowed to live? No, of course not! All their righteous acts will be forgotten, and they will die for their sins. “Yet you say, ‘The Lord isn't doing what’s right!’ Listen to me, O people of Israel. Am I the one not doing what’s right, or is it you? When righteous people turn from their righteous behaviour and start doing sinful things, they will die for it. Yes, they will die because of their sinful deeds. And if wicked people turn from their wickedness, obey the law, and do what is just and right, they will save their lives. They will live because they thought it over and decided to turn from their sins. Such people will not die. And yet the people of Israel keep saying, ‘The Lord isn't doing what’s right!’ O people of Israel, it is you who are not doing what’s right, not I. “Therefore, I will judge each of you, O people of Israel, according to your actions, says the Sovereign Lord. Repent, and turn from your sins. Don’t let them destroy you! Put all your rebellion behind you, and find yourselves a new heart and a new spirit. For why should you die O people of Israel? I don’t want you to die, says the Sovereign Lord. Turn back and live.”
(Ezekiel 18: 21-32)

We all clearly have a choice: to turn from the things that are ‘wicked’, to do what is right. We cannot do this on our own, we make mistakes. Due to these mistakes we feel guilty and powerless, and do not want to be judged for our mistakes as this just makes the agony worse. It is why people seem to dislike the church and indeed Christians, or religious people. This is exactly why Jesus came… to restore our broken hearts. I have lived most of my life, fearful of the opinions of others; my background; my body image; my social skills; my ability to interact with humour - I have felt inadequate.

I know that in all of this, Jesus sustains me in ways that I cannot fathom. Without him I would be a shadow of the man I am today, full of conflicted emotions and unresolved anguish. He is the author and finisher of my faith. If you have not met with Jesus before, then as we finish today, ask him into your heart with a simple prayer of repentance:

‘Lord, I have gone my own way for far too long and have reached a point in my life where I am ready to relinquish control. I have done many things that I shouldn't have, and forgotten or ignored doing the things I should have. I have fallen short and know that I have sinned. I ask you Lord to forgive me of my sin through the death of your son Jesus, and ask that you fill me with your Holy Spirit. I accept you as my Lord and Saviour and ask you to walk with me during the remainder of my life.’

Pick up your bible and read through the Gospels and into ACTS; find a local church that is running an Alpha Course and bring everything to God in prayer… You won’t look back.